Skip to content
Nexus Club Desk

Venezuela Could Now Determine Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the World

Following launching a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US military forces had effectively seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "governing the state" actually means is unclear, but the vow represents an abrupt shift in direction for the president, rife with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now betting his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to recruit American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, supplying funds for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – whether for good or ill.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is more than willing to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are notably different.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be difficult for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless use of force and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and assets that are fundamental to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible attack on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a criminal and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform congressional leaders before launching the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American casualties and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is gambling his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unclear. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is bound to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

By

Kiara Eaton MD

Lena is a digital strategist and community builder passionate about fostering creative networks.

Nexus Club Desk

Type to search articles.